The Last of the Hybrids – Kenwood TS-830s

21 February 2026 | by Richard AA4OO | Leave a Comment (0)

Hybrid Goodness

A good friend dropped off a radio and mic that he had received from a SK. It is a Kenwood TS-830s, which according to the serial number was manufactured December 1980.

The TS-830s was the last of the Hybrid's manufactured by Kenwood.

The Golden Age of the Hybrid: Best of Both Worlds?

If you've spent any time scouring the used market for a "new-to-you" HF rig, you’ve likely bumped into the Hybrids. For those of us who love the glow of a filament but appreciate the reliability of solid-state components, these rigs represent a very specific, nostalgic era of amateur radio engineering.

So, what exactly makes a rig a "Hybrid"?

It’s all about the hand-off between technologies. These transceivers aren't "all-tube" in the boatanchor sense, nor are they fully solid-state like the modern SDRs sitting on our desks today. Instead, they used semiconductors for the heavy lifting in the low-level circuits—think oscillators and IF stages—while saving the vacuum tubes for the "muscle."

The Magic Formula: 12BY7 + 2x 6146B

Almost every classic hybrid followed a predictable, battle-tested recipe. If you pop the hood, you’re almost guaranteed to find this exact lineup:

The Driver: A single 12BY7 tube.

The Finals: A pair of 6146s.

This combination was the "Goldilocks" setup for the 1970s ham. It reliably pumped out about 100 watts—plenty of PEP to work the world from a modest backyard wire.

Why the 6146?

The 6146 wasn't just common; it was "The Finals Tube." It was rugged, relatively inexpensive, and offered great linearity. It’s the reason so many of these rigs are still on the air today. NOS tubes are still available for less than $70/each.

You’ll find this exact "Hybrid" DNA across the most legendary gear of the era:

The Kenwood Line: From the TS-520 through the TS-820 and 830S (widely considered the pinnacle of the hybrid age).

The Heathkit "Hot Water" Series: The ubiquitous HW-100 and HW-101.

The SB-Series: The refined SB-101 and SB-102 "Green Giants."

There is just something satisfying about the "warm-up" period and the manual "Tune & Load" process that a modern rig can't replicate. It forces you to actually interact with your station. Plus, let's be honest—the smell of tubes in the shack is worth at least 3dB of "feel-good" gain.

Image of Finals from another site

Do old electrolytic capacitors always need replacement?

If you’ve spent any time on the forums or at a local hamfest, you’ve heard the mantra: "Friends don't let friends power up vintage gear without a recap." While there is some wisdom there, if we are being honest with our soldering irons, not all "old" capacitors are created equal.

In fact, there’s a strong argument to be made that the electrolytic caps found in a 1980 Kenwood TS-830s are actually more reliable than the junk found in 1990s consumer electronics.

Here is the breakdown of why "older" often meant "sturdier" in the world of vintage RF gear.

1. The "Capacitor Plague" of the 90s

The primary reason 70s and 80s caps get a bad rap is that people lump them in with the "Capacitor Plague" of the late 90s and early 2000s. During that era, a massive industrial espionage blunder led to a faulty electrolyte formula being used across the industry.

These 90s caps didn't just drift in value; they were "time bombs" that would bulge, leak corrosive fluid, and fail catastrophically within just a few years. By contrast, the Japanese-made caps from the 70s and early 80s (like those from Nichicon or United Chemi-Con) were over-engineered and built with stable, well-understood chemistry.

2. Physical Size and Heat Dissipation

In the 70s and 80s, we weren't trying to fit a transceiver into a pocket. Components were physically larger. A 1000µF capacitor from 1980 is often twice the size of a modern equivalent with the same rating.

Surface Area: Larger cans dissipate heat better.

Electrolyte Volume: More physical space meant more electrolyte fluid. Since the primary failure mode of an electrolytic is the fluid drying out over decades, having more "juice" to start with gave these old components a much longer runway.

3. Operating Margins

Back in the "Hybrid" glory days, engineers weren't shaving every penny off the Bill of Materials. If a circuit needed a 25V capacitor, you’d often find a 35V or 50V part in there just for the headroom.

Modern manufacturing in the 90s moved toward "just enough" specs. When you run a capacitor right at its voltage or temperature limit, its lifespan drops exponentially. Those beefy 70s components were often "loafing" along, which is why you can still find 50-year-old Heathkits that hold a steady voltage.

The "Don't Be Reckless" Disclaimer

While those 70s and early 80s caps were built like tanks, physics eventually wins. Even the best electrolyte will eventually dry out or the rubber seals will perish.

If you're bringing a rig out of a 20-year slumber, don't just "flip the switch." Use a Variac to slowly reform the capacitors.

That being said, my friend had already purchased replacement caps so I went ahead and replaced the 500V HV caps because the originals showed an arc-over and spattered solder from sometime in the past.

Original HV caps

See the solder splash and arc-over on the lead to the left 500v cap?

Replaced

Replaced with modern caps

When you go to replace these old caps you realize they don't make 'em like they used to. The old beefy "can" capacitors had four tall, sturdy solder posts. Kenwood designers used those extra lugs as convenient tie-points, daisy-chaining multiple wires for the high-voltage rails and ground returns directly onto the capacitor itself.

But the modern replacement is a "snap-in" style cap with two tiny, stubby pins designed for a PCB, not a bundle of 18-gauge hookup wire.

Trying to cram three or four vintage wires onto one miniature modern post was not fun. I ended up using the leads of the bleed resistor as solder posts.

Finally on the air after a rookie mistake

After replacing the caps I tested the voltage at the caps and all seemed good. I buttoned it up and attempted to tune into a dummy load while watching an amp meter to see if the rig was drawing the prescribed current... and found that I had no bias current.

I freaked out! No bias means the tubes run wide open and turn into oven elements.

I took everything back apart and started tracing the bias circuit. It simply had no power. I calmed down and thought "How could replacing the HV caps have crippled the bias current?". Well it shouldn't. Then I vaguely recalled brushing a switch on the back of the radio as I had turned it over. What is that switch? The manual calls it the "Screen Grid Switch" and apparently it's used when neutralizing the tubes, or some such hollow-state magic that I never learned to do. What I did learn is that if it's switched off, you ain't got no bias current, or any other current needed to test transmit.

Whew! Panic averted.

Operation

The "Tune-Up" Dance

If you’re coming from the world of modern "no-tune" solid-state rigs, the front panel of a vintage hybrid will have some controls with unfamiliar names like DRIVE, LOAD, PLATE, CARRIER, etc. Before you throw your callsign out there, you have to perform the "Tune, Dip, and Load" ritual.

This isn't just for nostalgia; it’s about matching the high impedance of those vacuum tubes to your 50-ohm antenna system and bringing the tank circuit into resonance. Skip this step, and you aren't just risking "band splatter"—you’re asking those precious 6146B finals to cook themselves to death.

The Warm-Up: Low Power into the Dummy Load

Never tune up "live" on the air if you can help it. I always start by switching over to a dummy load. After a good look at the manual, I set the mode to TUNE, the meter to ALC, and set the CARRIER knob to about a quarter turn.

With the DRIVE knob centered, I flipped the switch to SEND. I peaked the DRIVE and tweaked the CARRIER until the meter stayed happily within the ALC range, then flipped back to REC. This gets our low-level stages talking to the finals without stressing the tubes.

The "Dip": Finding Resonance

Next comes the most satisfying part of hybrid operation: Dipping the Plate.

Set the meter to IP (Plate Current).
Pre-set the PLATE knob to the segment of the band I’m targeting.
Flip to SEND and carefully sweep the PLATE control until the needle "dips" to its lowest point.

This "dip" is the signal that your circuit is in resonance. You want to center the needle right at the bottom of that valley and flip back to REC quickly—tubes don't like sitting in a non-resonant state for more than a few seconds!

Putting "Fire in the Wire"

Now that we’re resonant in low-power mode, it’s time to give those 6146s their legs. I switched the mode from TUNE to CW to get the full HV (High Voltage) on the plates.

Keep an eye on that plate current! You want to stay at or below 265mA. Use the CARRIER knob to keep the drive power in check.

I noticed something interesting during this stage: the LOAD peaked at a different spot in full power than it did in the low-power TUNE mode. This required another quick "re-dip" of the PLATE. Some folks say a shifting peak like that points to a "soft" 12BY7 driver tube, but since I’m seeing a solid 100 Watts out on 40m and 30m, I’m not ready to convict the driver just yet.

It’s quite a process compared to pushing a button on a modern rig, but there’s a soul to this machine that makes every contact feel earned.

On-Air Performance and Operating Impressions

Voice Operations on 40m

I started by making several Phone contacts on the 40-meter band. Audio reports were positive, and the rig stayed stable on frequency. Before getting on the air, I spent some time balancing the gain between the D-104 microphone and the radio’s internal mic gain. To do this, I monitored the meter in ALC mode while watching the RF output on my dummy load to ensure I wasn't over-driving the gain.

CW Operations on 30m

Moving up to 30 meters for some CW, I sent out a single call—primarily to check my frequency on the Reverse Beacon Network (RBN). I was immediately answered by KB6UN. We had a productive 25-minute ragchew discussing antennas, hamfests, and vintage gear. The TS-830S performed admirably throughout the contact.

Operating Oddities

While the TS-830S is feature-rich compared to my Ten-Tec Century/21 or Heathkit HW-101, it has several design quirks that take some adjustment.

CW Offset and Tuning

On a modern transceiver, the VFO display typically indicates your actual transmit frequency. On the TS-830S, the transmit frequency is offset by 800 Hz from the indicated frequency. This may be common in older gear, but without a digital VFO on my other vintage rigs, the offset is much more apparent here.

Zero-Beating Without a Filter

The sidetone on this rig is fixed at 800 Hz. While you can use the RIT to adjust the listening frequency, you must be careful not to do so until you have zero-beat the other station. Unlike my modern rigs, there is no "spot" function or visual indicator for zero-beating.

On my HW-101, the sharp 250 Hz CW filter helps peak the signal when you are on frequency. Since this TS-830S lacks a narrow CW filter, I have to rely on a manual tone-match:

Switch the gain knob to turn off break-in mode.
Hold down the key to hear the internal 800 Hz sidetone.
Match the pitch of the incoming signal to that sidetone.

Interestingly, the RF meter peaks when the station is not at a zero-beat, so the needle cannot be used as a tuning aid. Additionally, since this radio predates built-in keyers, you’ll need an external unit or a mechanical key. The jack is wired for a standard "tip = dit" configuration.

The AF/Sidetone Conflict

My primary complaint involves the sidetone volume. In this design, the sidetone level is tied directly to the AF (audio frequency) gain control. I prefer to operate with the RF gain turned down and the AF gain turned up to manage band noise, but this makes the sidetone deafeningly loud during transmission.

Currently, I have to manually turn the AF gain down before every transmission and back up to listen. I am planning to research a modification to separate the sidetone level from the main volume control to make CW operation more practical.

Filtering and Narrow-Band Operation

This transceiver predates the era of Digital Signal Processing (DSP), relying entirely on analog circuitry and crystal filters. While the TS-830S offered optional crystal filters for CW, this particular unit is only equipped with the standard SSB crystal filter. There is no digital noise reduction or sharp audio peaking for CW signals.

What this rig does provide—which was likely a novel feature at the time—is a Variable Bandwidth Tuning (VBT) control. This allows you to linearly narrow the IF bandwidth down to approximately 500 Hz with a 6 dB slope. It is certainly not "sharp" by modern standards; even with the bandwidth dialed all the way down, I can still hear stations within 2 kHz of my frequency.

To help manage interference, the radio includes:

Adjustable Notch Filter: Useful for knocking down a specific nearby CW carrier.
IF Shift: This allows you to move the passband relative to the signal to further reject adjacent QRM.

While these controls are effective for an analog design, they are a far cry from a modern rig like my Yaesu FT-DX10. On the Yaesu, I can achieve a razor-sharp focus on a single CW signal and essentially make the rest of the band disappear. On the hybrid, you are always operating with a much wider "window" into the RF spectrum.

The things I like

Thermal management and fan noise

One thing I immediately noticed about the TS-830S is how quiet the fan is. Despite the fact that the vacuum tubes generate a significant amount of heat—essentially operating at "oven" levels—the fan is variable speed and remains very quiet even when moving a large volume of air.

I have complained about the fan noise on my FT-DX10 numerous times. Operating the Kenwood reminds me of the design choices Yaesu has made with their modern rigs; simply mounting a standard muffin fan on the back is a far less sophisticated solution compared to the integrated thermal design found in this older equipment.

Sound

The TS-830S is technically a dual-conversion transceiver utilizing two intermediate frequencies: 8.83 MHz and 455 kHz. However, its architecture differs from the traditional "Collins type" designs, like the older TS-520. In the TS-830S, the bandwidth of both IF stages is narrowed simultaneously during VBT operation. Because of this specific implementation, it essentially functions like a single-conversion transceiver with an 8.83 MHz IF.

Despite the lack of modern filtering, the receiver is very pleasant to listen to. In fact, other than the volume control issue I mentioned previously, the sidetone on this rig sounds far better than the raspy, digitized sidetone on my Yaesu FT-DX10.

The audio out of the case is excellent. It has a very good speaker that is well isolated, and can go to high volumes without distorting. The case itself has felt / damping materials where edges mate with other panels, to reduce resonance. It is nicely designed. Speaking of the case itself, it is thick metal. Not car ramp thick, but sturdy, not bendy.

There is a definite appeal to switching off the modern SDR rigs and their "super-filtered" audio. Sometimes it’s worth returning to a simpler design that down-converts RF to the audible range without sending the signal through light-years of digital processing before it reaches your ears.

Little things

Having a built-in power supply is nice, especially since it would require a multi-voltage external supply like my HW-101 if it was not built in.

The controls are well laid out. After just a couple minutes of operation everything fell to hand without searching for the control

Lastly, the VFO moves with the perfect amount of resistance. For a radio that is 46 years old that doesn't appear to have visited a service center (there are no service stickers), to have a reduction drive geared VFO that operates this smoothly, again speaks to the quality of manufacture of these old Kenwoods.

Conclusions

I plan to spend more time with the rig. Hopefully, I can record some QSOs so that folks who began operating with more modern rigs can see what it's like to get on the air with these beauties.

They don't make them like they used to.

This is NOT a QRP rig, so I won't offer my normal "Lower your power and raise your expectations", but I will say "Sometimes traveling the older paths leads you to a new revelation"

That's all for now

73

AA4OO Rich

Richard Carpenter, AA4OO, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from North Carolina, USA. Contact him at aa4oo@hamradioqrp.com.

» Leave a Comment (0)

The Last of the Hybrids – Kenwood TS-830s

21 February 2026 | by Richard AA4OO | Leave a Comment (1)

Hybrid Goodness

A good friend dropped off a radio and mic that he had received from a SK. It is a Kenwood TS-830s, which according to the serial number was manufactured December 1980.

The TS-830s was the last of the Hybrid's manufactured by Kenwood.

The Golden Age of the Hybrid: Best of Both Worlds?

If you've spent any time scouring the used market for a "new-to-you" HF rig, you’ve likely bumped into the Hybrids. For those of us who love the glow of a filament but appreciate the reliability of solid-state components, these rigs represent a very specific, nostalgic era of amateur radio engineering.

So, what exactly makes a rig a "Hybrid"?

It’s all about the hand-off between technologies. These transceivers aren't "all-tube" in the boatanchor sense, nor are they fully solid-state like the modern SDRs sitting on our desks today. Instead, they used semiconductors for the heavy lifting in the low-level circuits—think oscillators and IF stages—while saving the vacuum tubes for the "muscle."

The Magic Formula: 12BY7 + 2x 6146B

Almost every classic hybrid followed a predictable, battle-tested recipe. If you pop the hood, you’re almost guaranteed to find this exact lineup:

The Driver: A single 12BY7 tube.

The Finals: A pair of 6146s.

This combination was the "Goldilocks" setup for the 1970s ham. It reliably pumped out about 100 watts—plenty of PEP to work the world from a modest backyard wire.

Why the 6146?

The 6146 wasn't just common; it was "The Finals Tube." It was rugged, relatively inexpensive, and offered great linearity. It’s the reason so many of these rigs are still on the air today. NOS tubes are still available for less than $70/each.

You’ll find this exact "Hybrid" DNA across the most legendary gear of the era:

The Kenwood Line: From the TS-520 through the TS-820 and 830S (widely considered the pinnacle of the hybrid age).

The Heathkit "Hot Water" Series: The ubiquitous HW-100 and HW-101.

The SB-Series: The refined SB-101 and SB-102 "Green Giants."

There is just something satisfying about the "warm-up" period and the manual "Tune & Load" process that a modern rig can't replicate. It forces you to actually interact with your station. Plus, let's be honest—the smell of tubes in the shack is worth at least 3dB of "feel-good" gain.

Image of Finals from another site

Do old electrolytic capacitors always need replacement?

If you’ve spent any time on the forums or at a local hamfest, you’ve heard the mantra: "Friends don't let friends power up vintage gear without a recap." While there is some wisdom there, if we are being honest with our soldering irons, not all "old" capacitors are created equal.

In fact, there’s a strong argument to be made that the electrolytic caps found in a 1980 Kenwood TS-830s are actually more reliable than the junk found in 1990s consumer electronics.

Here is the breakdown of why "older" often meant "sturdier" in the world of vintage RF gear.

1. The "Capacitor Plague" of the 90s

The primary reason 70s and 80s caps get a bad rap is that people lump them in with the "Capacitor Plague" of the late 90s and early 2000s. During that era, a massive industrial espionage blunder led to a faulty electrolyte formula being used across the industry.

These 90s caps didn't just drift in value; they were "time bombs" that would bulge, leak corrosive fluid, and fail catastrophically within just a few years. By contrast, the Japanese-made caps from the 70s and early 80s (like those from Nichicon or United Chemi-Con) were over-engineered and built with stable, well-understood chemistry.

2. Physical Size and Heat Dissipation

In the 70s and 80s, we weren't trying to fit a transceiver into a pocket. Components were physically larger. A 1000µF capacitor from 1980 is often twice the size of a modern equivalent with the same rating.

Surface Area: Larger cans dissipate heat better.

Electrolyte Volume: More physical space meant more electrolyte fluid. Since the primary failure mode of an electrolytic is the fluid drying out over decades, having more "juice" to start with gave these old components a much longer runway.

3. Operating Margins

Back in the "Hybrid" glory days, engineers weren't shaving every penny off the Bill of Materials. If a circuit needed a 25V capacitor, you’d often find a 35V or 50V part in there just for the headroom.

Modern manufacturing in the 90s moved toward "just enough" specs. When you run a capacitor right at its voltage or temperature limit, its lifespan drops exponentially. Those beefy 70s components were often "loafing" along, which is why you can still find 50-year-old Heathkits that hold a steady voltage.

The "Don't Be Reckless" Disclaimer

While those 70s and early 80s caps were built like tanks, physics eventually wins. Even the best electrolyte will eventually dry out or the rubber seals will perish.

If you're bringing a rig out of a 20-year slumber, don't just "flip the switch." Use a Variac to slowly reform the capacitors.

That being said, my friend had already purchased replacement caps so I went ahead and replaced the 500V HV caps because the originals showed an arc-over and spattered solder from sometime in the past.

Original HV caps

See the solder splash and arc-over on the lead to the left 500v cap?

Replaced

Replaced with modern caps

When you go to replace these old caps you realize they don't make 'em like they used to. The old beefy "can" capacitors had four tall, sturdy solder posts. Kenwood designers used those extra lugs as convenient tie-points, daisy-chaining multiple wires for the high-voltage rails and ground returns directly onto the capacitor itself.

But the modern replacement is a "snap-in" style cap with two tiny, stubby pins designed for a PCB, not a bundle of 18-gauge hookup wire.

Trying to cram three or four vintage wires onto one miniature modern post was not fun. I ended up using the leads of the bleed resistor as solder posts.

Finally on the air after a rookie mistake

After replacing the caps I tested the voltage at the caps and all seemed good. I buttoned it up and attempted to tune into a dummy load while watching an amp meter to see if the rig was drawing the prescribed current... and found that I had no bias current.

I freaked out! No bias means the tubes run wide open and turn into oven elements.

I took everything back apart and started tracing the bias circuit. It simply had no power. I calmed down and thought "How could replacing the HV caps have crippled the bias current?". Well it shouldn't. Then I vaguely recalled brushing a switch on the back of the radio as I had turned it over. What is that switch? The manual calls it the "Screen Grid Switch" and apparently it's used when neutralizing the tubes, or some such hollow-state magic that I never learned to do. What I did learn is that if it's switched off, you ain't got no bias current, or any other current needed to test transmit.

Whew! Panic averted.

Operation

The "Tune-Up" Dance

If you’re coming from the world of modern "no-tune" solid-state rigs, the front panel of a vintage hybrid will have some controls with unfamiliar names like DRIVE, LOAD, PLATE, CARRIER, etc. Before you throw your callsign out there, you have to perform the "Tune, Dip, and Load" ritual.

This isn't just for nostalgia; it’s about matching the high impedance of those vacuum tubes to your 50-ohm antenna system and bringing the tank circuit into resonance. Skip this step, and you aren't just risking "band splatter"—you’re asking those precious 6146B finals to cook themselves to death.

The Warm-Up: Low Power into the Dummy Load

Never tune up "live" on the air if you can help it. I always start by switching over to a dummy load. After a good look at the manual, I set the mode to TUNE, the meter to ALC, and set the CARRIER knob to about a quarter turn.

With the DRIVE knob centered, I flipped the switch to SEND. I peaked the DRIVE and tweaked the CARRIER until the meter stayed happily within the ALC range, then flipped back to REC. This gets our low-level stages talking to the finals without stressing the tubes.

The "Dip": Finding Resonance

Next comes the most satisfying part of hybrid operation: Dipping the Plate.

Set the meter to IP (Plate Current).
Pre-set the PLATE knob to the segment of the band I’m targeting.
Flip to SEND and carefully sweep the PLATE control until the needle "dips" to its lowest point.

This "dip" is the signal that your circuit is in resonance. You want to center the needle right at the bottom of that valley and flip back to REC quickly—tubes don't like sitting in a non-resonant state for more than a few seconds!

Putting "Fire in the Wire"

Now that we’re resonant in low-power mode, it’s time to give those 6146s their legs. I switched the mode from TUNE to CW to get the full HV (High Voltage) on the plates.

Keep an eye on that plate current! You want to stay at or below 265mA. Use the CARRIER knob to keep the drive power in check.

I noticed something interesting during this stage: the LOAD peaked at a different spot in full power than it did in the low-power TUNE mode. This required another quick "re-dip" of the PLATE. Some folks say a shifting peak like that points to a "soft" 12BY7 driver tube, but since I’m seeing a solid 100 Watts out on 40m and 30m, I’m not ready to convict the driver just yet.

It’s quite a process compared to pushing a button on a modern rig, but there’s a soul to this machine that makes every contact feel earned.

On-Air Performance and Operating Impressions

Voice Operations on 40m

I started by making several Phone contacts on the 40-meter band. Audio reports were positive, and the rig stayed stable on frequency. Before getting on the air, I spent some time balancing the gain between the D-104 microphone and the radio’s internal mic gain. To do this, I monitored the meter in ALC mode while watching the RF output on my dummy load to ensure I wasn't over-driving the gain.

CW Operations on 30m

Moving up to 30 meters for some CW, I sent out a single call—primarily to check my frequency on the Reverse Beacon Network (RBN). I was immediately answered by KB6UN. We had a productive 25-minute ragchew discussing antennas, hamfests, and vintage gear. The TS-830S performed admirably throughout the contact.

Operating Oddities

While the TS-830S is feature-rich compared to my Ten-Tec Century/21 or Heathkit HW-101, it has several design quirks that take some adjustment.

CW Offset and Tuning

On a modern transceiver, the VFO display typically indicates your actual transmit frequency. On the TS-830S, the transmit frequency is offset by 800 Hz from the indicated frequency. This may be common in older gear, but without a digital VFO on my other vintage rigs, the offset is much more apparent here.

Zero-Beating Without a Filter

The sidetone on this rig is fixed at 800 Hz. While you can use the RIT to adjust the listening frequency, you must be careful not to do so until you have zero-beat the other station. Unlike my modern rigs, there is no "spot" function or visual indicator for zero-beating.

On my HW-101, the sharp 250 Hz CW filter helps peak the signal when you are on frequency. Since this TS-830S lacks a narrow CW filter, I have to rely on a manual tone-match:

Switch the gain knob to turn off break-in mode.
Hold down the key to hear the internal 800 Hz sidetone.
Match the pitch of the incoming signal to that sidetone.

Interestingly, the RF meter peaks when the station is not at a zero-beat, so the needle cannot be used as a tuning aid. Additionally, since this radio predates built-in keyers, you’ll need an external unit or a mechanical key. The jack is wired for a standard "tip = dit" configuration.

The AF/Sidetone Conflict

My primary complaint involves the sidetone volume. In this design, the sidetone level is tied directly to the AF (audio frequency) gain control. I prefer to operate with the RF gain turned down and the AF gain turned up to manage band noise, but this makes the sidetone deafeningly loud during transmission.

Currently, I have to manually turn the AF gain down before every transmission and back up to listen. I am planning to research a modification to separate the sidetone level from the main volume control to make CW operation more practical.

Filtering and Narrow-Band Operation

This transceiver predates the era of Digital Signal Processing (DSP), relying entirely on analog circuitry and crystal filters. While the TS-830S offered optional crystal filters for CW, this particular unit is only equipped with the standard SSB crystal filter. There is no digital noise reduction or sharp audio peaking for CW signals.

What this rig does provide—which was likely a novel feature at the time—is a Variable Bandwidth Tuning (VBT) control. This allows you to linearly narrow the IF bandwidth down to approximately 500 Hz with a 6 dB slope. It is certainly not "sharp" by modern standards; even with the bandwidth dialed all the way down, I can still hear stations within 2 kHz of my frequency.

To help manage interference, the radio includes:

Adjustable Notch Filter: Useful for knocking down a specific nearby CW carrier.
IF Shift: This allows you to move the passband relative to the signal to further reject adjacent QRM.

While these controls are effective for an analog design, they are a far cry from a modern rig like my Yaesu FT-DX10. On the Yaesu, I can achieve a razor-sharp focus on a single CW signal and essentially make the rest of the band disappear. On the hybrid, you are always operating with a much wider "window" into the RF spectrum.

The things I like

Thermal management and fan noise

One thing I immediately noticed about the TS-830S is how quiet the fan is. Despite the fact that the vacuum tubes generate a significant amount of heat—essentially operating at "oven" levels—the fan is variable speed and remains very quiet even when moving a large volume of air.

I have complained about the fan noise on my FT-DX10 numerous times. Operating the Kenwood reminds me of the design choices Yaesu has made with their modern rigs; simply mounting a standard muffin fan on the back is a far less sophisticated solution compared to the integrated thermal design found in this older equipment.

Sound

The TS-830S is technically a dual-conversion transceiver utilizing two intermediate frequencies: 8.83 MHz and 455 kHz. However, its architecture differs from the traditional "Collins type" designs, like the older TS-520. In the TS-830S, the bandwidth of both IF stages is narrowed simultaneously during VBT operation. Because of this specific implementation, it essentially functions like a single-conversion transceiver with an 8.83 MHz IF.

Despite the lack of modern filtering, the receiver is very pleasant to listen to. In fact, other than the volume control issue I mentioned previously, the sidetone on this rig sounds far better than the raspy, digitized sidetone on my Yaesu FT-DX10.

The audio out of the case is excellent. It has a very good speaker that is well isolated, and can go to high volumes without distorting. The case itself has felt / damping materials where edges mate with other panels, to reduce resonance. It is nicely designed. Speaking of the case itself, it is thick metal. Not car ramp thick, but sturdy, not bendy.

There is a definite appeal to switching off the modern SDR rigs and their "super-filtered" audio. Sometimes it’s worth returning to a simpler design that down-converts RF to the audible range without sending the signal through light-years of digital processing before it reaches your ears.

Little things

Having a built-in power supply is nice, especially since it would require a multi-voltage external supply like my HW-101 if it was not built in.

The controls are well laid out. After just a couple minutes of operation everything fell to hand without searching for the control

Lastly, the VFO moves with the perfect amount of resistance. For a radio that is 46 years old that doesn't appear to have visited a service center (there are no service stickers), to have a reduction drive geared VFO that operates this smoothly, again speaks to the quality of manufacture of these old Kenwoods.

Conclusions

I plan to spend more time with the rig. Hopefully, I can record some QSOs so that folks who began operating with more modern rigs can see what it's like to get on the air with these beauties.

They don't make them like they used to.

This is NOT a QRP rig, so I won't offer my normal "Lower your power and raise your expectations", but I will say "Sometimes traveling the older paths leads you to a new revelation"

That's all for now

73

AA4OO Rich

Richard Carpenter, AA4OO, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from North Carolina, USA. Contact him at aa4oo@hamradioqrp.com.

» Leave a Comment (1)

Amateur Radio Weekly – Issue 409

21 February 2026 | by Cale K4HCK | Leave a Comment (0)

FT2: The fastest digital mode ever created
3.8-second cycles — Complete QSO in 11 seconds. 4x faster than FT8.
FT2

Parks on the Air’s explosive growth and the next chapter
POTA is usually described in simple terms: It’s growing quickly.
Q5

BAOFENG UV-5R Mini: First impressions
These things are small. They are about the size of an FRS radio but feel a little more solid in the hand.
Random Wire

Anytone AT-D890UV full duplex satellite HT
This new HT should have real full duplex capability – it can transmit on VHF and receive on UHF without any desense.
AMSAT-SM

Zero Retries Digital Conference 2026 announced
ZRDC 2026 will be held on Friday 2026-10-16 at the Roundhouse Conference Center in San Ramon, California, USA.
Zero Retries Digital Conference

Worldwide Bunkers on the Air
WWBOTA is an exciting mix of Amateur Radio and history enabling radio amateurs to ‘activate’ with portable and mobile operations from historic bunker locations.
WWBOTA

SWR Magazine Waves Weekend
An on-air special event taking place on February 21, 2026. We will be activating KP3SWR from Puerto Rico.
SWR Magazine

RSGB: A year in numbers 2025
Amateur Radio continues to evolve and the RSGB, in turn, develops how it supports current radio amateurs and reaches out to new audiences.
Radio Society of Great Britain

WQ2XDM – New US experimental callsign for radio propagation tests
K9JMS recently received permission from the FCC to carry out propagation tests at 40 MHz (8m) and 70 MHz (4m).
EI7GL

Video

You should try Linux for Ham Radio today
It’s never been easier running Linux on a cheap laptop for Ham Radio.
Ham Radio Crash Course

The ultimate emergency comms trailer
A detailed tour of the brand-new Duval County ARES trailer.
KM4ACK

FT2 is the fastest digital mode ever created
With 3.8 seconds per tx/rx, this has been claimed to be the fastest digital mode to date.
Tech Minds

Get Amateur Radio Weekly in your inbox.

Sign-up here

Amateur Radio Weekly is curated by Cale Mooth K4HCK. Sign up free to receive ham radio's most relevant news, projects, technology and events by e-mail each week at http://www.hamweekly.com.

» Leave a Comment (0)

SOTA Challenge: CW/SSB on 2m & 70cm

20 February 2026 | by Bob KØNR | Leave a Comment (0)

The SOTA Management Team launched a special challenge for 2026: a distance-based scoring challenge using CW and SSB on the 2m and 70cm bands. The announcement is here on the SOTA reflector.

The basic idea is to encourage SOTA contacts using CW or SSB on these two bands. Because the scoring is based on distance, you need to enter the location of the other station. When chasing a summit, the location is already known by the SOTA database, but you need to have your location entered into the logging system. Summit-to-Summit contacts are easy to log because both locations are known. The hassle comes up when you are activating a summit and need the chaser’s location. An easy way to share location info is using the 6-character grid locator (e.g., DM78av at my house). Some chasers may know their 6-character locator but you may need to look it up. I usually ask the other operator if they are operating at home so I can look up the grid later. If they are away from home, I ask for enough information to be able to determine their grid.

W0C Activity

I wasn’t sure how many folks would pursue this challenge here in Colorado, but we are off to a good start. Here’s the current activator summary:

K0JJW and I have activated 5 times for the challenge, and have been pleasantly surprised with the number of chasers who get on, primarily using 2m SSB. It seems that some hams have 2m SSB capability, but don’t have many opportunities to use it. So they come out to play!

There are a few things to be aware of when operating these bands and modes:

Antenna Polarization

The first thing we ran into was the need to make sure both stations have the same antenna polarization. Common practice on VHF/UHF is to use vertical polarization for FM (and similar modes), but use horizontal polarization for CW/SSB and other weak-signal modes. The serious stations on CW/SSB will tend to have large Yagi antennas, horizontally polarized. But we soon found that many of the chasers at home were using vertical antennas on CW/SSB, because that’s what they have set up. No problem, on the summit we just flipped our handheld Yagi antenna to be vertical. The point is that antenna polarization should be taken into account, else you can experience a substantial signal loss.

Tuning in SSB

Another issue that surfaced is the need to do more precise tuning when using SSB. For FM, you can just dial in 146.52 or whatever and call it good. If there is a small frequency difference between stations, it does not matter. On SSB, a few hundred Hertz of frequency difference (which is common) causes the familiar “Donald Duck” effect, so you need to tune more carefully.

Most people know that the 2m SSB calling frequency is 144.200 MHz, so they start there. But if you hear an activator on 144.2001, you should tune to match their frequency when you call them. Don’t just sit on 144.200 and think “the other station is off frequency.”

Calling Frequency

Some sources list 144.100 or even 144.060 as the 2m CW calling frequency. These frequencies can be used, but common practice in Colorado is to just call CW or SSB on 144.200 MHz. That way, people monitoring the band for activity can find it more easily. Same thing with 432.100 MHz on the 70 cm band. Clearly, posting spots on SOTAwatch can really help with making CW & SSB contacts.

When activity picks up, the calling frequency can get busy. This is why most radios have a big knob on the front of the radio that allows you to tune up or down. Standard practice is to move up 5 or 10 kHz, as needed. If you are operating on the calling frequency for a long period of time, you should not be surprised if other people show up on frequency. It works best if everyone cooperates, shares the frequency, and moves to adjacent frequencies when possible. This is similar to how 146.52 MHz can get busy on FM, so people shift to using 146.58 MHz to spread things out.

Quansheng UV-K5

Various people have hacked the Quansheng UV-K5, a dualband HT, to operate using CW and SSB. The modification consists of loading new firmware and, in some cases, doing a simple hardware modification. This video provides an overview of how this works. Many people are having fun modifying this HT, and it is an inexpensive way to get up and running on CW/SSB.

So come on out and give CW/SSB a try on VHF/UHF.

73 Bob K0NR

Getting Started on 2m SSB

The post SOTA Challenge: CW/SSB on 2m & 70cm appeared first on The KØNR Radio Site.

Bob Witte, KØNR, is a regular contributor to AmateurRadio.com and writes from Colorado, USA. Contact him at bob@k0nr.com.

» Leave a Comment (0)

AmateurLogic.TV 2026-02-18 05:30:24

18 February 2026 | by George W5JDX | Leave a Comment (0)

Ham College episode 134 is now available for download.

Technician Exam Questions Part 21.
T7A – Station equipment: receivers, transceivers, transmitter amplifiers, receive amplifiers, transverters; Basic radio circuit concepts and terminology: sensitivity, selectivity, mixers, oscillators, PTT, modulation.
T7B – Symptoms, causes, and cures of common transmitter and receiver problems: overload and overdrive, distortion, interference and consumer electronics, RF feedback.

Download
YouTube

George Thomas, W5JDX, is co-host of AmateurLogic.TV, an original amateur radio video program hosted by George Thomas (W5JDX), Tommy Martin (N5ZNO), Peter Berrett (VK3PB), and Emile Diodene (KE5QKR). Contact him at george@amateurlogic.tv.

» Leave a Comment (0)

AmateurLogic 214: Hamfest, OpenHamClock and Power Pole Hack

14 February 2026 | by George W5JDX | Leave a Comment (1)

AmateurLogic.TV Episode 214 is now available for download.

Explore OpenHamClock, Raspberry Pi Trixie, and the Choyong LC90 Internet radio. Retain your power pole connectors with a cheap hack. Visit with friends at the 2026 Capital City Hamfest.

Download
YouTube

George Thomas, W5JDX, is co-host of AmateurLogic.TV, an original amateur radio video program hosted by George Thomas (W5JDX), Tommy Martin (N5ZNO), Peter Berrett (VK3PB), and Emile Diodene (KE5QKR). Contact him at george@amateurlogic.tv.

» Leave a Comment (1)

Amateur Radio Weekly – Issue 408

14 February 2026 | by Cale K4HCK | Leave a Comment (0)

Indiana Amateur Radio license plate
New design for Indiana Amateurs.
ARRL Indiana Section

Amateur Radio Software Award nominations
Promoting software projects that enhance and adhere to the spirit of Amateur Radio: innovative, free and open.
Amateur Radio Software Award

Why I resigned after 12 years as assistant director of the ARRL Delta Division
This is a principle issue in my eyes.
K4FMH

Petition for Rulemaking response
The prohibition on encryption is a primary deterrent against the commercial use of amateur spectrum.
AC5A

ADRCS collaborates with TARPN on IP400 Project
This will extend the functionality of the IP400 network to conventional radios on the 2M, 220, and 450 MHz bands.
ADRCS

We’ve calculated all the views on the planet
Click on any point to show the longest line of sight at that location.
All The Views In The World

Practical guide to receiving HF weather fax
One of the most rewarding niches in the shortwave hobby.
DXR electronic Bits

Can you work DX on VHF & UHF?
Yes, you can.
OnAllBands

Trials & Errors #73: Playing at Radio
An ‘accidental’ journey into radio, born out of curiosity.
QRZ

Putting together a new ham starter package
Nudging a teacher to Tech after a historic school contact with astronaut Chris Williams.
K3LOE

SolarCdx.com
Solar weather insights for Hams.
SolarCdx.com

Amateur astronomers detect signal from Voyager 1 spacecraft
Voyager 1 is now 15 billion miles from Earth.
IFLScience

Get Amateur Radio Weekly in your inbox.

Sign-up here

Amateur Radio Weekly is curated by Cale Mooth K4HCK. Sign up free to receive ham radio's most relevant news, projects, technology and events by e-mail each week at http://www.hamweekly.com.

» Leave a Comment (0)